Powered by Feedburner

Elevator Pitch

Click the little arrow to listen.

Welcome new readers!

Stephen Smith Productivity Workflow consulting

Please visit our Friends

Quality Logo Products

Promotional Flash Drives




Fresh Focus on Productivity Consulting Blog for Profit
Wrike.com


del.icio.us RSS










Personally, I welcome our Knol overlords.

December 20th, 2007 by Stephen

Posted in Communication, Digital Apps, New Media, Stupid Hype |

Welcome back! It's good to see you again. Please note that I am now publishing all new material at my hub site: In Context Blog

The fine folks at Google have released a new project that they call “Knol“:

The key idea behind the knol project is to highlight authors. Books have authors’ names right on the cover, news articles have bylines, scientific articles always have authors — but somehow the web evolved without a strong standard to keep authors names highlighted. We believe that knowing who wrote what will significantly help users make better use of web content. At the heart, a knol is just a web page; we use the word “knol” as the name of the project and as an instance of an article interchangeably. It is well-organized, nicely presented, and has a distinct look and feel, but it is still just a web page. Google will provide easy-to-use tools for writing, editing, and so on, and it will provide free hosting of the content. Writers only need to write; we’ll do the rest.

The post at the Google blog carries a few loaded phrases like this one:

A knol on a particular topic is meant to be the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read.

Does that mean that a Knol on a given topic will become the number one search result when someone “Googles” it? If that is the case it will be a mad scramble to create Knols on every topic imaginable where somebody already has the number one position. I am proud to say that my own meager efforts on this blog have resulted in a number one search position that brings 10-15% of my traffic every day.

But, you ask, “What is a Knol?” Good question. A Knol seems to be “the mutant love child of Wikipedia and Seth Godin’s Squidoo. I’d explain more about how it works, but honestly, that just about covers it.” (thanks Sonia!)
Squidoo is a really cool place where you can find information on an amazing variety of subjects. These lenses are compiled by some very dedicated (some might say obsessed) folks who have a great deal of knowledge and passion for their subject. You can learn about laptop bags and Getting Things Done; you can read about people, whether they are famous like Britney Spears or someone less notorious.

Developed in part by Seth Godin, the Squidoo system is best explained in his e-book Everyone is an Expert. Back in November Seth gave a talk at Google and then, well:

Anyway, I got back from my trip to Google and crunched some numbers and posted this good news about Squidoo. We’ve hit profitability, grown to be three to five times as big as others in our space and reached more than 125,000 users. A good day.

The very next day, Google announced Knol, a direct lift from Squidoo circa 2005. Apparently, Google wants to be in our business. It’s almost enough to ruin your day.

Then, a funny thing happened: I started getting notes of congratulations. Of all the business models and all the internet ideas to jump on, Google had chosen ours. There were hundreds of neat ideas out there, but they picked ours.

It is said that imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. Or is it intimidation? Google says “The goal is for knols to cover all topics, from scientific concepts, to medical information, from geographical and historical, to entertainment, from product information, to how-to-fix-it instructions.” And of course, to have a firm grip on how these pages get ranked in search results.

Personally, I am not sure how much people will like the idea of web pages that anyone can edit. It’s one thing for wikipedia, which is supposed to be an information resource, it’s quite another for your homepage. Inevitably these pages are going to get punked, as people go in and add links to their own blogs and websites. Or simply vandalized, the way that Wikipedia is nearly every day (check out these edits compiled by Wired).
Over at TechCrunch there is a lively disussion, featuring a great deal of cynicism mixed with trepidation about what is coming next, in the Comments to this post.

I am curious

  • Do any of you currently use or create lenses at Squidoo?
  • Would you make a Knol if it had preferential search result treatment?
  • Will you make a Knol anyway, as part of your own marketing program?
  • What do you think will happen if disgruntled customers make Knols for companies before the companies get to it?

Watching this play out ought to be very entertaining. I am looking forward to finding out what happens!


Leave a Comment: 6 Comments »


Subscribe to Productivity in Context by Email.
Get involved with the Work.Life.Creativity forum.

Would You Buy a Blogger’s T-shirt

August 8th, 2007 by Stephen

Posted in Blog, Entrepreneur, GTD, Global Microbrand, Just fun, Product Reviews, Stupid Hype, Viral Marketing, Work 2.0 |

Lenore Skenazy says that t-shirts are the lazy man’s scrapbook:

Humble, trite and tacky though they may be, T-shirts remain one of the longest-lived promos you could ever throw at a customer. Long after the free pen has exploded and the free Frisbee has been chewed (hopefully not by you), the T-shirt remains a garment — something we humans seem hard-wired not to throw out. And we never seem to get enough of them, either.

And so I ask you, if I came up with some snazzy designs and put them up at Cafe Press, would anyone be interested? Vote for your favorite design: (these are very rough mockups, I have no mad skillz!)



Leave a Comment: 3 Comments »


Subscribe to Productivity in Context by Email.
Get involved with the Work.Life.Creativity forum.

The iPhone Killer

July 1st, 2007 by Stephen

Posted in Brainstorming, Gear, Stupid Hype |

There has been tremendous hype this past week about the new iPhone, which apparently can do all sorts of things. The problem for me is that I do not want a phone that does all of that. I just want my phone to be a phone (and I am one of those people who does not like to talk on the phone in the first place).

One Gadget, Multiple Uses

The idea of convergence in technology is an exciting one, I mean who wants to carry around a backpack full of different devices just so you can go online, track your appointments, listen to music, watch videos/TV, and make telephone calls? Pretty soon you have 20 pounds of gear and half-a-dozen chargers.

The idea behind the iPhone is an attractive one. There is one major drawback, however, with this kind of connectedness: it’s too much and too little at the same time. Don’t get me wrong, I am looking forward to the day that we can get a small device that can handle all sorts of functions: combining the power and utility of a laptop with the portability of a Palm Pilot or BlackBerry, the “notebooks” one finds in William Gibson’s fiction. But I do not want it to be a phone.

Phone + ______ = “The Next Big Thing”

I personally find it difficult to understand the current fetish of combining one’s phone with other types of devices - the phone/music player, the phone/video player, the phone/organizer, the phone/camera. Can someone please take all of the other devices and combine them into one, 5″x7″x1″ unit with a screen and a little keyboard? This would be a useful device. Then we can do all of the things that we need to do while we are on-the-go and experience the productivity that this technology promises. Without being interrupted every few minutes by incoming calls.

The Wrong Direction

The Marketing Geniuses are taking the idea of the telephone down the wrong road, adding features that phones just do not need. I can just imagine a bunch of “creative types” sitting around a table brainstorming, “What if you had a phone that could also make cappuccino? That would be cool!”

No, it would not.

Here is an idea for the Geniuses to work on, what if you had a phone that was the size of a AA battery, with a clip and a retractable ear-bud? Make it voice-activated and solar-powered. Shock-proof. Water-proof.

Then give me more Services, rather than more Features. Like directions. Restaurant reviews. Weather forecasts. Movie times. Let me bookmark and tag these calls. Hook me in to a database of streaming-voice, or connect me to a live person (even if they are in India). Now that would be a phone. A phone that I can use while I play/work with my “convergence device”, instead of having to stop what I am doing for the call. That will be the iPhone killer.

Update: see a similar take at getFreshMinds

Update II: Web Worker Daily reviews a trio of devices that are getting close.


Leave a Comment: 2 Comments »


Subscribe to Productivity in Context by Email.
Get involved with the Work.Life.Creativity forum.

Next Entries »

Creative Commons License
This work by Stephen Smith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.