If you're new here, Welcome! To learn more about what this site is all about click here [link].

I am a small business Conversation Consultant and public speaker that uses the power of the internet to leverage your success. Productivity in Context is a web magazine focused on Productivity and tools for organizing. Make this your headquarters for improving your life and work through increased mindfulness, education, and workflow practices.

Subscribe by E-mail for updates on: Productivity methods, Lifestyle innovation, and the collaborative design of the next-generation personal knowledge management system.

Click Here for an overview of the content. Please take a look at our sponsors. (Hosting isn't free...)
Please contact me via e-mail: stephen @ hdbizblog dot com

Today’s guest post is by Al at 7P Productions.

This is the conclusion of the ACE series, where I compare it with SMART and EASIER.

Part 1 of the series introduced ACE (Assess, Commit, Execute) which can be used for both simple and large tasks and goals, and part 2 of the series explained in more details of how ACE can be used for the larger tasks. The ACE system was something I created to help myself, and I was compelled to post it since I also came across SMART (Specific, Measureable, Achieveable, Realistic, and Time-bound) and EASIER (Envision, Assess, Strategize, Implement, Evaluate, and Report), which were both similar to ACE.

The ACE steps are straightforward for smaller tasks, but can expand for larger tasks. From the previous post in this series, here is a summary of the full ACE system:

• Assess: Check the cost, then see if you can afford it under its TERMs (Time, Effort, Resource, and Money).
• Commit: Go through the 3 C’s. Does the task or goal fit into context with your master plan? Remember you have the choice to not commit. If you do commit, conceptualize a successful execution of the task.
• Execute: Do not hesitate and execute through completion. Use milestones for long-term projects.

SMART is a good acronym to help set goals, which is what is happening also in the Assess step above. ACE is more of an beginning-to-end system, which EASIER is also. The main difference I see between the two is that EASIER helps with the large goals and ACE is simple enough for small goals but can expand for big goals as well.

From a side-by-side comparison, I see each system being complete for what they are trying to do. Instead of picking the overall best from the three, I would say the best is the one that specifically suits your need. If you need help just to set goals, SMART is a popular acronym that other people may already know about. If you’re looking for something from beginning-to-end system, I’d say go for either ACE or EASIER. I think ACE is easier to remember (pardon the pun), and I like how ACE is a three-step process for simple tasks, but can be more involved for larger tasks when needed (however, since I’m the one who came up with ACE, I am a little biased).

Epilogue
It was also noted by Lisa Gates that there should be a “pre-assess” step as well, in order to establish core values as necessary anchors. I totally agree with this viewpoint, because setting goals without a master plan is basically being in a rush to get to nowhere. Some sort of long-term planning, even life-long planning, is needed before any of all this is meaningful.

If you found this post useful, please share it with your friends on Twitter using the tinylink http://tinyurl.com/5dg9jc. Thanks, I appreciate it! Feel free to comment below, I enjoy discussing these ideas. ~@Stephen